Does the change need an assessment?
Use risk, uncertainty, customer impact, and reversibility to choose the right level of evidence.
Run the decision checkResource centre
Make each part of the model decision reviewable.
Start with the question you own. Every guide names its audience, the decision it supports, practical steps, a worked example, and the next useful action.
Choose a path
Decide, prepare, interpret, and protect.
The resource centre follows the assessment journey rather than product modules or internal architecture.
01Stage
Decide
Work out whether a change needs evidence and how to act on the answer.
02Stage
Prepare
Define the two options, representative cases, and useful checks.
03Stage
Interpret
Read quality, latency, reliability, failures, usage, and cost together.
04Stage
Protect
Plan provider access, customer data, retention, and honest limitations.
All resources
Start with the task in front of you.
Search by decision, baseline, cases, quality, latency, reliability, cost, access, data, or limitations.
9 of 9 guidesAll tasks
01Decide · Decision checkDoes this model change need an assessment?
Use the decision, customer impact, uncertainty, and cost of being wrong to choose the right level of evidence.
Product and engineering leaders deciding whether to approve evaluation work.02Prepare · Comparison scopeChoose a baseline and candidateDescribe the current and proposed paths precisely enough that another reviewer can tell what changed.
Engineering and AI practitioners who own model, prompt, gateway, or provider configuration.03Prepare · Case designSelect up to 10 representative casesCover ordinary work, important edges, and known failure risks without copying unnecessary production data.
Product owners, domain reviewers, and AI practitioners choosing the assessment inputs.04Prepare · Quality methodDefine useful quality checksMeasure the behaviours the task requires instead of hiding the decision behind one generic quality score.
Domain experts, product owners, and AI practitioners agreeing how responses will be judged.05Interpret · Operational evidenceInterpret latency, reliability, failures, and costKeep timing, completion, recovery, usage, and price assumptions distinct so averages do not hide the trade-off.
Engineering, product, and business reviewers reading operational findings.06Interpret · Report reviewRead a model change assessmentMove from the recommendation to the cases, method, trade-offs, confidence, and next actions that support it.
Decision owners and reviewers receiving a Loometry assessment.07Decide · Next decisionAct on mixed or inconclusive findingsChoose a focused mitigation, retest, limited pilot, or decision to stay instead of forcing a false winner.
Decision owners resolving trade-offs after an assessment.08Protect · Provider accessPrepare provider access safelyConfirm the account path and minimum access needed without sending credentials through a public form or report.
Engineering and security reviewers preparing an approved provider connection.09Protect · Data and claimsUnderstand data handling and limitationsTrace the approved inputs through the assessment and keep every conclusion proportionate to the cases and method.
Product, security, privacy, legal, and procurement reviewers assessing the engagement boundary.Recommended starting points
Three ways into the same decision.
Use the decision check when the scope is unclear, the sample when you want to inspect the deliverable, or contact when the change is already defined.
Read a complete synthetic sample.
See the executive answer, scorecard, case-level findings, trade-offs, limitations, and next actions.
View the sample assessmentBring the baseline and candidate.
Share only high-level decision facts. Do not send credentials, confidential prompts, or customer data.
Loometry Model Change Assessment
Bring one model change. Get a decision-ready answer.
Share the baseline, candidate, decision, and timing at a high level. We will confirm fit, scope, access needs, delivery timing, and the fixed project quote before work begins.